Metropolis Night Party by Emer
Verified Match
Target Retail Price$$

Secured by Amazon / Partner

Emer

Metropolis Night Party

Scentonym Analysis

6.7 Value Rating
Similarity Score89%

Conclusion

Is Metropolis Night Party a perfect dupe? No. But it's a solid everyday option if you like the New York Nights scent profile. If you want that hyper-realistic, luxurious feel, splurge on the Bond No. 9. But if you're on a budget and want something that's "close enough" for daily wear, this is a good bet. It's a fun, slightly sweet floral that won't break the bank. Office safe? Probably not. Date night? Yes.

Notes & Nuances

Metropolis Night Party... okay, the name is trying a bit too hard, but the juice isn't bad. It's clearly going for that New York Nights vibe. You get a blast of white florals up top – gardenia leading the charge, backed by a spicy carnation that keeps things interesting. The jasmine is there, but more subtle than the OG. The heart shifts into a slightly aquatic patchouli. It's not a challenging patchouli, more of a grounding element. The caramel and coffee base is where this differs most from New York Nights. It's sweeter, less refined. I'd say it captures about 89% of the original's DNA, but with a cheaper, slightly synthetic edge in the drydown. The original has a creamier smoothness that's missing here.

The Performance Stats

For an Emer fragrance, the performance is surprisingly decent. I'm getting about 5-6 hours on my skin with moderate projection for the first hour or two. It settles closer to the skin after that. Not beast mode, but perfectly acceptable point. A second application after lunch will easily get you through a date night.

Performance Audit

Longevity
5+ Hours

Based on average wear time

Projection
Moderate

Sillage & radius

Price Tier
$$$$$

Relative to market avg

Total Value Score
Performance per dollar ratio
6.7
Concentration
Eau de Parfum
Community Votes
258

Why we track this:

Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Bond No. 9 pricing.

Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 258 enthusiast votes for accuracy.