
Scentonym Analysis
Our objective metric for performance per dollar.
Olfactory Experience
The opening presents a blast of pineapple, superficially similar to Aventus. However, the bergamot is dialed up significantly, creating a sharper, more citric initial impact, diverging from Aventus' smoother, smokier start. The apple note is detectable, adding a fruity sweetness. The heart features birch, attempting to mimic the smoky leather of Aventus. It's not quite as refined, exhibiting a slightly synthetic birch tar note, bordering on harsh. Jasmine and patchouli are present but remain in the background, offering a hint of floral and earthy complexity. The base is where this clone falters most noticeably. The musk leans synthetic and lacks the nuanced ambergris quality of Creed's fragrance. The oakmoss is present, adding some earthiness, but the vanilla sweetens it considerably, altering the drydown profile into something slightly gourmand. Overall, this clone captures approximately 90% of the Aventus DNA.
To Buy or Not to Buy?
This is a decent attempt at cloning Aventus. It captures the essence, but lacks the refinement and natural ingredients that make the original so expensive. If you crave the Aventus profile and are unwilling to pay Creed's price, this is a passable substitute. However, be aware of the slightly synthetic edges. But the quality difference is noticeable, and that justifies at least some of the cost disparity. This clone is best suited for casual wear.
Wear time & Sillage
Longevity is moderate. Expect around 5-6 hours on skin. Projection is decent for the first hour, then settles closer to the skin. It's a polite fragrance, not a room-filler.
Performance Audit
Based on average wear time
Sillage & radius
Relative to market avg
Why we track this:
Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Creed pricing.
Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 386 enthusiast votes for accuracy.