Daarej Pour Homme by Rasasi
Verified Match
Target Retail Price$$

Secured by Amazon / Partner

Rasasi

Daarej Pour Homme

Scentonym Analysis

7.2 Value Rating
Similarity Score92%

How it Smells

Daarej opens with a blast of candied orange peel. Think Sunny Delight concentrate, not fresh mandarin. There's a fleeting herbal twinge from the basil, quickly overtaken by a dominant mace note. It's reminiscent of Christmas potpourri left simmering too long. The sandalwood and cedar emerge in the mid, but they're more pencil shavings than a walk in the woods. The base is where it noticeably deviates. It's a cloying vanilla amber accord with a powdery heliotrope – similar to baby wipes mixed with burnt sugar. It strives for warmth but ends up smelling synthetic. This diverges significantly from the inspiration, skipping the refined dryness and elegance.

Is it Worth It?

Wearing this versus the Valentino is like trading a bespoke suit for an off-the-rack polyester blend. You get the general idea, but the quality difference is glaring. You're gaining volume and sweetness with Daarej but losing the balanced, sophisticated profile that makes the original so appealing. This is a simplified, louder interpretation that sacrifices subtlety for mass appeal.

How Long Does it Last?

Longevity is surprisingly decent. I got about six hours before it became a skin scent. Projection is moderate for the first two hours, extending about an arm's length before quickly diminishing. I tested it during a workday in a climate-controlled office. It didn't offend, but it also didn't impress. It would likely choke out a small space if oversprayed.

Performance Audit

Longevity
7+ Hours

Based on average wear time

Projection
Moderate

Sillage & radius

Price Tier
$$$$$

Relative to market avg

Total Value Score
Performance per dollar ratio
7.2
Concentration
Eau de Parfum
Community Votes
404

Why we track this:

Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Valentino pricing.

Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 404 enthusiast votes for accuracy.