Extra Woods by Maison Alhambra
Verified Match
Target Retail Price$$

Secured by Amazon / Partner

Maison Alhambra

Extra Woods

Targeting:BvlgariMan

Scentonym Analysis

7.9 Value Rating
Similarity Score86%

Scent Breakdown

Extra Woods opens with a surprisingly bright violet leaf, though it lacks the crisp, photorealistic quality of Bvlgari Man. A slightly candied lotus note peeks through, followed by a zesty bergamot – a familiar and pleasant beginning. The heart leans heavily on sandalwood, giving it a creamier, albeit somewhat synthetic, woodiness compared to the more refined vetiver found in the original. The dry down is where Extra Woods diverges most. Instead of a clean, masculine musk, a noticeable white honey note emerges, sweetened further by benzoin. It’s pleasant, but different; a touch cloying if oversprayed. It captures maybe 86% of the Bvlgari Man vibe, swapping nuanced sophistication for bolder sweetness.

The Performance Stats

Longevity is decent, hovering around 5-6 hours on my skin. Projection is moderate for the first hour, then settles into a close skin scent. Not a powerhouse, but respectable .

Final Thoughts

Extra Woods is a solid budget option for those seeking a close approximation of Bvlgari Man. The sweeter drydown might appeal to those who find the original a little too austere. If you crave the polished refinement and natural ingredients of Bvlgari Man, the original is worth the extra investment. But if you're on a tight budget and simply want the essence of that woody-floral profile, Extra Woods is a worthy contender. It suits a younger man, someone who appreciates a touch of sweetness and doesn't mind a less complex composition.

Performance Audit

Longevity
8+ Hours

Based on average wear time

Projection
Moderate

Sillage & radius

Price Tier
$$$$$

Relative to market avg

Total Value Score
Performance per dollar ratio
7.9
Concentration
Eau de Parfum
Community Votes
96

Why we track this:

Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Bvlgari pricing.

Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 96 enthusiast votes for accuracy.