
Scentonym Analysis
Our objective metric for performance per dollar.
To Buy or Not to Buy?
This fragrance is best suited for someone who desires a bright, clean scent, but has very limited scent experience. Perhaps a student experimenting with fragrances or someone working in a heavily regulated environment where projection is frowned upon. They may appreciate its attempt at sophisticated cleanliness but lack the discernment to notice the composition's shortcomings.
Notes & Nuances
Mystique Bouquet opens with a peculiar aldehyde blast; not the elegant, Chanel-esque fizz, but more akin to a metallic tang layered over artificial peach rings. The bergamot is timid, quickly overshadowed. The heart attempts to mimic a floral lightness, but the orange blossom leans heavily into an indolic sharpness, wrestling with a generic, sweet "clean laundry" note. This clashes, creating a disquieting powderiness. The drydown is where the divergence from its inspiration is most pronounced. Instead of a refined musk, there's a harsher, almost scratchy ambroxan amplified by a woody note that smells suspiciously like cedar shavings from a pet store.
Wear time & Sillage
Longevity clocks in at a decent 6-7 hours, though the base notes become cloying over time. Projection is moderate for the first hour, extending about an arm's length, before settling close to the skin. I tested it during a moderately active day of errands; the heat amplified the synthetic elements, making it less pleasant.
Performance Audit
Based on average wear time
Sillage & radius
Relative to market avg
Why we track this:
Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Parfums de Marly pricing.
Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 60 enthusiast votes for accuracy.