Chance by Fragrance World
Verified Match
Target Retail Price$$

Secured by Amazon / Partner

Fragrance World

Chance

Scentonym Analysis

6.7 Value Rating
Similarity Score87%

To Buy or Not to Buy?

A solid clone if you appreciate a fragrance that closely resembles the original. Given the price difference, "Chance" is a good option for those seeking the Eau Tendre vibe without the Chanel price tag. Those seeking the refinement and multi-layered complexity of the genuine article should invest in the original. If you want a very similar scent profile but can live without some of the nuance, this clone is the way to go.

Olfactory Experience

Fragrance World's "Chance" opens with a tart quince and grapefruit accord. The grapefruit leans slightly more synthetic than the natural zest found in Chanel's Eau Tendre. The hyacinth and jasmine heart emerges quickly. The floral notes, while present, lack the airy quality of the original. Where Eau Tendre whispers, this speaks a little louder, with a slightly sharper floral intensity. The base is a relatively straightforward musk, iris, and cedar blend. It's clean, but somewhat muted. The dry down is where the divergence becomes more noticeable; the musk feels more linear and less nuanced compared to the complexity of the original Chanel. Overall, it captures approximately 87% of Eau Tendre's essence, but with discernible synthetic edges.

The Performance Stats

Longevity is moderate. I get about 4-5 hours on skin. Projection is initially moderate, creating a noticeable scent bubble for the first hour, then settling closer to the skin. Not a powerhouse, but adequate for daily wear.

Performance Audit

Longevity
5+ Hours

Based on average wear time

Projection
Moderate

Sillage & radius

Price Tier
$$$$$

Relative to market avg

Total Value Score
Performance per dollar ratio
6.7
Concentration
Eau de Parfum
Community Votes
425

Why we track this:

Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Chanel pricing.

Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 425 enthusiast votes for accuracy.