
Scentonym Analysis
Our objective metric for performance per dollar.
Is it Worth It?
Forza offers a decent approximation of Alexandria II . If you crave the *idea* of the Xerjoff fragrance and can tolerate a slightly synthetic edge, Forza is a viable option. However, for those seeking the true depth and quality of the original, the price jump is justifiable. This is a good entry point, but ultimately unsatisfying for the discerning nose.
Scent Breakdown
Forza opens with a potent rosewood and cinnamon blast. The lavender is present, but subdued, lending a slight aromatic edge. This deviates slightly from Alexandria II's smoother, more balanced opening. The heart reveals a prominent, almost candied rose, alongside cedar and a faint lily-of-the-valley. While Xerjoff's creation boasts a refined floral complexity, Forza leans sweeter and less nuanced. The drydown showcases a synthetic oud accord. Sandalwood provides a creamy backdrop, and vanilla adds sweetness. It imitates the warmth of Alexandria II's base but lacks the depth and richness of the original's authentic oud. I'd estimate this is about 95% similar to the original overall. The key difference lies in the quality of ingredients; Forza uses cheaper synthetics, particularly in the base.
The Performance Stats
Longevity is respectable; expect 6-7 hours on skin. Projection is moderate for the first two hours, then it settles closer to the skin. Not a beast mode fragrance by any stretch.
Performance Audit
Based on average wear time
Sillage & radius
Relative to market avg
Why we track this:
Price Arbitrage: Significant savings compared to the original Xerjoff pricing.
Community Verified: Cross-referenced against 340 enthusiast votes for accuracy.
Beast Mode Performance: Identified as having exceptional longevity and projection.